Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Biden's Catechetical Dementia


Edited and published in The Federalist, April 27, 2022. Original version is below:

How the administration's abortion ideology-driven assault on faith and conscience threatens care for millions of needy individuals

By Jonathan Imbody[i]

The year is 2024, and the Biden administration's assault on conscience freedoms has taken a tragic toll on the healthcare landscape.

Since the 2022 elimination of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) conscience protections for health professionals, government-sanctioned discrimination has driven out of medicine persons of faith and pro-life convictions, accelerating and exacerbating the long-predicted physician shortage crisis. The shortage leaves millions of patients, especially the poor and marginalized, without the faith-based care on which they had depended.

From medical students to doctors to hospitals and clinics, no one who hews to Hippocratic or Judeo-Christian ethics can survive the administration's ideological purge of healthcare.

Three examples illustrate the individual, institutional and national impact:

·         A summa cum laude college graduate interviews at countless medical schools but cannot find one that will tolerate her Christian faith. Woke academic institutions blatantly discriminate, having taken their cues from the elimination of the HHS conscience rule and the ceasing of prosecutions of conscience law violators. Christians and pro-lifers need not apply.

·         A faith-based, pro-life clinic faces a financial crisis as it desperately tries to continue its charitable mission of caring for thousands of low-income patients in the community without the federal Title X funds that had helped them care for pregnant women and teens and their families. The Biden HHS Title X rule requires grantees to make referrals for abortions--a conscience-trampling rule that effectively bars pro-life clinics from the program.

·         Nationwide, a raft of federal agency rules enforce the administration's intolerance for and discrimination against all those who do not kowtow to leftist ideology. Mandating ideological submission on matters of the sanctity of human life, sexuality and marriage, the regulations slam the door on federal aid for thousands of pro-life hospitals and clinics as well as highly effective faith-based social programs for adoption and foster care, food and clothing distribution, mental health services, ex-offender programs, drug and alcohol rehabilitation, marriage and family counseling and teen pregnancy prevention programs. Millions of individuals served by these programs suffer as a result.

This peek into a conscience-trampling future is actually a glimpse of the past and the present.

The above account of medical school discrimination comes from a young woman who details her experience in an email: "I was top of my class (summa cum laude) as an undergrad at UC Berkeley, had an MCAT score above the average of all the medical schools I applied to, and I had participated in many extracurriculars including being on the leadership team of my church and campus ministry group. I think I applied to essentially all of the medical schools in my home state of California. I did not get even a single interview--except for the faith-based school of Loma Linda. I knew that declaring my faith in my application would likely not be seen favorably by many. I guess I didn't expect it to be everyone."

A national scientific survey of faith-based health professionals that I constructed with then-pollster Kellyanne Conway in 2009, replicated in 2019, found that widespread discrimination begins in medical school and continues throughout an individual's career. Three in five faith-based medical professionals agreed with the poll statement that it is common that "doctors, medical students or other healthcare professionals face discrimination for declining to participate in activities or provide medical procedures to which they have moral or religious objections."

The above account of a clinic that lost federal Title X family planning funds relates to the Biden administration's scheme, announced in April 2021, that reverses a Trump administration statute-driven policy and instead requires grantees to make abortion referrals: "Each project supported under this part must … offer pregnant clients the opportunity to be provided information and counseling regarding… pregnancy termination."

The abortion referral requirement impacts pro-life clinics such as Staten Island, New York's Beacon Christian Community Health Center. The ministry "provides quality, affordable healthcare" for the community's poor and pledges to "uphold and promote the value and sacredness of each individual human life from conception to death." Beacon won an award under the Trump rule but no longer receives Title X funds to aid its low-income patients. The Biden administration now effectively reserves those funds for its abortion business political supporters, turning Title X into a marketing mechanism that leads patients to abortion clinics.

As Valerie Huber, Trump's acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Population Affairs that oversees the Title X program, told me, "Requiring abortion referral turns a Title X clinic into a location where abortion is treated as a method of family planning. This is clearly against the spirit and the letter of the statute."

The above account of a nationwide regulatory agenda of intolerance reflects the Biden administration's multiple federal agency mandates designed to force compliance with leftist ideological stances and eliminate conscientious objectors.

As The Federalist has documented, the Biden HHS already has torn down the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division, stripped the HHS Office of Civil Rights' authority to enforce conscience and religious projections under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment, dismissed a case of forced abortion participation, assured abortionists that "we have your back" and rescinded conscience waivers that had allowed federal grants to faith-based adoption and foster care agencies.

The Biden administration now is churning out more rules that aggressively enforce its ideology on issues including abortion; religious exemptions; insurance coverage of contraceptives and abortifacients; sterilization; gender identity interventions; gender identity issues in sports, bathrooms and locker rooms; compelled speech; and Title IX sexual harassment due process protections.

At the top of the administration's list of ideological mandates is abortion, an issue on which self-described "good Catholic" Joe Biden apparently suffers from catechetical dementia.

In 2006, Biden proudly proclaimed, “I do not vote for funding for abortion." But in his 2019 presidential run, he dropped his long-standing support for the Hyde Amendment that prohibits most government funding for abortion. His administration's blitzkrieg of rules now are embedding abortion ideology in government policy while essentially eliminating funding for abortion opponents.

The administration's anti-religion ideological purge threatens to create what Richard John Neuhaus warned of in 1984--a naked public square, a government devoid of religious participation, values and moral influence.

In particular, excluding the faith community from health care bodes severe consequences.

Both our 2009 and 2019 aforementioned national surveys of faith-based health professionals revealed that 91% of respondents said they either strongly or somewhat agreed with the statement, "I would rather stop practicing medicine altogether than be forced to violate my conscience." They cannot separate their faith-motivated mission to care for the poor from their faith commitment to honor the sanctity of human life.

Left unchecked, by 2024, Biden administration policies may well succeed in driving the pro-life and faith communities out of partnerships with the federal government. The victims of the resulting naked public square will be millions of patients, the poor and other needy and suffering individuals served by faith-based health and social services programs.

Biden unwittingly pronounced his own judgment when he condemned Vladimir Putin for using the power of government to force the Ukrainian people to violate their values and submit to his profane ideology.

"For God's sake, this man cannot remain in power."



[i] Jonathan Imbody is a writer and consultant with FaithSteps.net and has several decades of experience in federal healthcare and religious freedom public policy.

No comments:

Featured Post

The Equality Act would trample on doctors' religious freedom

Published in The Washington Examiner by Jonathan Imbody  | March 29, 2021 Imagine you are a family physician who entered medical school mot...