Published by The Washington Times, April 20, 2022
If you are a health professional who follows the Hippocratic
oath's proscription against abortion, should a government-funded hospital be
allowed to coerce you to participate in abortions against your professional
ethics and personal conscience?
Nurse Cathy DeCarlo faced just such coercion, despite her
agreement with a hospital that she would not participate in abortions, due to
her moral and ethical conscience convictions. The fateful day came when
hospital supervisors suddenly demanded she participate in an upcoming abortion,
threatening her with a charge of insubordination and abandoning her patient if
she refused.
“They threatened my job and my nursing license if I did not take part in the murder of that baby. I felt violated and betrayed," Cathy recalls. Forced to count the body parts of the baby torn apart during the abortion, she says, "It was like something out of a horror film."
Such nightmarish situations tragically are not uncommon in
healthcare, especially for pro-life and faith-centered health professionals.
A national scientific survey that then-pollster Kellyanne Conway and I designed some
years ago found that virtually all faith-based health professionals say it is
vital to "make sure that healthcare professionals in America are not
forced to participate in procedures or practices to which they have moral
objections."
Our survey results also highlighted a key understanding:
conscience protections protect patient access to healthcare. Many poor and
underserved population patients depend on faith-based healthcare, and if
government policies force those professionals and institutions out of medicine,
millions of patients stand to lose their healthcare.
Faith-based professionals and hospitals do not and cannot
separate their faith motivation to serve the needy from their faith convictions
to protect human life.
That's why over nine in ten of faith-based health professionals
agreed with our survey question, "I would rather stop practicing medicine
altogether than be forced to violate my conscience."
A follow-up survey that Heart and Mind Strategies and I designed in 2019
found that well over a third of faith-based health professionals
"experience pressure from or discrimination by faculty or administrators
based on your moral, ethical, or religious beliefs." Three in five said it
is common "that doctors, medical students or other healthcare
professionals face discrimination for declining to participate in activities or
provide medical procedures to which they have moral or religious
objections."
The survey helped provide a statistical basis for a common-sense
conscience rule promulgated in 2019 by the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS). That rule helped protect Hippocratic, prolife and faith-based
health professionals simply by detailing and highlighting the enforcement of
decades of bipartisan federal conscience laws.
The pro-abortion Biden administration now is moving to drive
those same professionals out of medicine. The Biden HHS, headed by Xavier
Becerra, the former Attorney General of California who promoted the abortion
industry and persecuted pro-life individuals, has announced the intention
to get rid of the existing HHS conscience protection rule.
The ill-considered move threatens to imperil patients'
healthcare access and promises to pump up the coffers of the abortion industry,
in part by permitting grant stipulations that prevent conscience-observing,
life-protecting health groups from competing for government grants. The move
delights Democrat campaign funders like Planned Parenthood, a $1.5 billion-dollar business that rakes in over half a billion dollars ($618.1 million) annually in taxpayer funding while performing over third of a
million (354,871) abortions.
Meanwhile, prolife and faith-based groups are fighting the rule
change and getting fact- and statute-based objections on the record with
government agencies. Such official objections can bolster later lawsuits over
the rule change.
Most Americans recoil at the thought of our government
penalizing individuals for their conscience convictions. Such anti-conscience
coercion undermines the foundational right to think and act freely, a
cornerstone of human rights and a free society.
Nevertheless, this administration is expected to continue the
withdrawal of the good conscience rule in the same bull-headed, tone-deaf,
lives-trampling fashion that it withdrew from Afghanistan.
Thankfully, Americans soon will have opportunity to realign
policy with human rights and the Constitution, by electing a pro-life,
faith-respecting Congress and administration.
Jonathan
Imbody is a public policy consultant and writer at FaithSteps.Net and has
several decades of experience in federal health policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment