Friday, June 29, 2012

Pro-life problems remain after Obamacare decision

The following analysis from pro-life leaders in Congress is helpful in sorting out yesterday's Supreme Court decision:

The Supreme Court has issued a decision in the cases related to the Affordable Care Act. The decision is available here. Abortion-related issues remain. Examples of pro-life objections include:
  1. Taxpayer funding for abortion coverage through the exchange premium assistance credits—complete with an abortion surcharge and secrecy clause.
  2. The abortion surcharge and secrecy clause established in Section 1303 were added as the mechanism for abortion funding under the Affordable Care Act.  Any subsidized plan that includes abortion will charge a surcharge of at least $1 per person to go into an abortion fund, and insurance companies are only allowed to disclose the surcharge at the time of enrollment. 
  3. Multi-state plans run by the federal Office of Personnel Management and subsidized, in part, by taxpayer subsidies, will still be allowed to cover abortion (except one must not include abortion as required in the ACA). 
  4. Preventive services mandate.  This mandate is currently being used to mandate sterilization and contraceptive coverage including the morning-after-pill.  In the future it could be used to mandate surgical and RU-486 abortion coverage. 
  5. Funding for abortion training is not excluded from the Teaching Health Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) program.
  6. Possible future abortion funding through Community Health Centers, High Risk Pools and other directly funded programs. 
  7. Potential funding for Planned Parenthood school-based health clinics.
  8. Lack of strong conscience protections to stop the government from forcing health care entities to participate in abortion. 
Click on these links for more resources about these cases which argued the constitutionality of the individual mandate, severability, applicability of the Anti-Injunction Act, and whether Medicaid funds can be tied to compliance with the ACA:

No comments:

Featured Post

The Equality Act would trample on doctors' religious freedom

Published in The Washington Examiner by Jonathan Imbody  | March 29, 2021 Imagine you are a family physician who entered medical school mot...