The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued
a final rule
that implements 25 federal conscience laws and strongly protects the exercise
of conscience freedom by health professionals and health entities in HHS funded
programs. HHS had issued a proposed
conscience rule in January 2018 and finalized the rule May 2 after reviewing
some 242,000 public comments, including from the Christian
Medical Association (CMA) and Freedom2Care, which strongly support the
rule.
In a news release
lauding the new rule, CMA CEO Dr. David Stevens said,
"Our patients need to know that we as doctors can be trusted to conscientiously adhere to objective ethical standards and moral commitments that serve to protect them. They need to know we are not going to lay aside longstanding ethical norms and medical concerns just because ideologically-driven politicians or bureaucrats or hospital administrators might pressure us to do so by threatening our ability to practice medicine."
CMA Executive Vice President Dr. Mike Chupp observed,
"Without conscience freedom in healthcare, whatever ideology the government chooses will be the grounds used to exclude all objectors. The result would be a loss of healthcare access for patients, and especially the patients of faith-based health professionals who often minister to the underserved and marginalized."
"Healthcare professionals won’t be bullied out of health care"
In announcing
the rule, HHS Office of Civil Rights Director Roger Severino declared,
"This rule ensures that healthcare entities and professionals won’t be bullied out of the health care field because they decline to participate in actions that violate their conscience, including the taking of human life. Protecting conscience and religious freedom not only fosters greater diversity in healthcare; it’s the law."
As explained in an HHS fact
sheet, where certain federal funds are involved the rules protect:
·
Health care entities and employees who have
conscience or religious objections related to performing, paying for, referring
for, providing coverage of, or providing certain services, such as abortion, sterilization, or assisted
suicide, or providing or receiving training in abortion.
·
Health care professionals who decline to receive training in abortions
or who attend medical schools that don’t require abortion training, and
applicants for training or study who have conscience or religious beliefs
relating to assisting or recommending abortions or sterilizations.
·
Individuals in a health service or research activity funded by an HHS program, where
they decline to perform or assist in part of that program because of sincere religious beliefs or moral convictions.
·
Patients
who object to certain procedures, including screenings and mental health
treatment of children or occupational illness testing, and in other specific
instances set forth by Congress.
HHS cites CMA / Freedom2Care polling
HHS's explanation of the new rule eight times cited national
polling commissioned by CMA and Freedom2Care, which showed that 87% of American adults surveyed believed it is
important to “make sure that healthcare professionals in America are not forced
to participate in procedures and practices to which they have moral
objections.”
The polling also revealed
that 91% of faith-based physicians declared that they would "rather stop
practicing medicine altogether than be forced to violate my conscience."
That key figure demonstrates the potential impact that a loss of conscience
protections could have on healthcare access for patients--especially the poor
and those in underserved areas and populations often served by faith-based
professionals and institutions.
A Politico article
on the new rule noted regarding the CMA and Freedom2Care polling, "No
other surveys are cited more frequently — and no other data is more central to
the Trump administration’s arguments. The Trump administration also uses the
survey data to argue that health workers will quit or medical students will
refuse to enter the field without its new rules." CMA and Freedom2Care
plan to update the polling with a new survey this year.
While Politico and
abortion advocates who oppose the rule made much of HHS's use of our polling,
the rule does not, in fact, rest on polling but on 25 federal
laws protecting conscience freedom in healthcare. An agency rule simply
enforces the law by detailing its application in the real world and, in many
cases, by providing recourse for individuals and entities victimized by abuses
of the law.
Discrimination victims gain a friend at HHS
The previous administration in 2009 gutted
the first HHS conscience rule
promulgated in 2008 and at times appeared determined to suppress conscience
freedom--to the point of attempting to force nuns to participate in its contraceptives
mandate.
With the new administration, however, "OCR [HHS Office of
Civil Rights] is now reporting a rise in civil rights complaints related to a
person’s moral beliefs, with 343 complaints in fiscal year 2018 compared to
just 10 similar complaints throughout the entire eight years of the Obama
administration," reports Roll Call.
The article continues:
"OCR says it received 1,333 complaints in fiscal 2018 alleging either religious or moral conscience discrimination. The number of religious complaints during the Obama administration wasn’t available, but conscience complaints averaged just 1.25 per year during the previous administration."
"The word has gotten out that we’re open for business and we are going to take the laws that we enforce seriously," said Severino. "There’s a real issue out here where people feel their rights have been violated and that they need redress and I think that explains the big growth in the number of complaints. It’s been long overdue that they need attention."
Abortion advocacy groups already have filed
lawsuits to stop the new rule. CMA will look for opportunities to counter
those lawsuits and defend the new rule on behalf of our members who depend on
conscience protections to engage in medical practice.
To learn how to file a complaint with HHS, to relate your own
experience of discrimination or to read stories of others who've experienced
discrimination, visit the Stories
page on our Freedom2Care website. To learn more about federal laws, the new
HHS rule and court cases visit the Laws, Regs and Cases page.
No comments:
Post a Comment