Key points and principles held by the Court:
1.
The Obama administration violated federal law--the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
(RFRA)--by substantially burdening the
free exercise of religion without taking the least restrictive means of
accomplishing its purpose of distributing free contraceptives. The Government
easily could have assumed the cost of contraceptives to employees of objecting
employers.
2.
The substantial burden on faith-based family
businesses included heavy fines (over
half a billion dollars imposed on
three companies alone) and forcing a choice between conscience or dropping healthcare for employees.
3.
The decision is narrow, applying to the contraceptive mandate and to closely held
companies (not to publicly traded corporations), and should not be seen as a
license for discrimination.
4.
The job of the court is not to assess the reasonableness of a religious objection, but simply to determine whether or not it
is sincere.
5.
The administration's position reveals that it
views religious freedom as less
important than Congress considers it.
6.
The Obama administration's position would allow
forcing religious objectors to participate in any medical procedure allowed by
law—including third-trimester abortions
or assisted suicide.
7.
The job of the Court is not to assess the wisdom
of Congress but to enforce the law (RFRA)
as written.
No comments:
Post a Comment