We need courage in the pulpit, courage in the pew

Barna research has reported that "Half of Christian pastors says they frequently (11%) or occasionally (39%) feel limited in their ability to speak out on moral and social issues because people will take offense. The other half of pastors say they only rarely (30%) or never (20%) feel limited in this way."

https://www.barna.com/research/pastors-speaking-out/

No, despite their expressed feelings, the first cited group of Christian pastors are not "limited in their ability to speak out on moral and social issues because people will take offense." They are limited by their own fear.
These pastors need courage.
They and we all need to imitate the courage of the early Church martyr Stephen, who spoke truth even at the cost of his own life.
Stephen did not shrink from controversy; he did not avoid conflict; he did not soften the Message to appease the hearers. Stephen confronted people with uncompromising, soul-challenging, sharply dividing Truth:

“You men who are stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears are always resisting the Holy Spirit; you are doing just as your fathers did. Which one of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? They killed those who had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become; you who received the law as ordained by angels, and yet did not keep it.”

"Now when they heard this, they were cut to the quick, and they began gnashing their teeth at him. But being full of the Holy Spirit, he gazed intently into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God ... (Acts 7:51-55)."

Stoning of Saint Stephen - Rembrandt

Following Christ requires counting the cost. We must give up all to gain all.
"Then Jesus said to His disciples, 'If anyone wishes to come after Me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me. For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it; but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it." (Matthew 16:24-25).
May God gives us courage to stand and speak His truth regardless of opposition, and God give us leaders of courage to lead.

Disassembling the abortion v. childbirth safety myth

The American Academy of Medical Ethics recently filed a brief in a very important upcoming Supreme Court case on abortion, June Medical Services v. Gee. The case centers on safety and health requirements on abortion clinics, and the brief dismantles the abortion industry's spurious argument that abortion is supposedly safer than childbirth.

The abortion industry launched a lawsuit after the state of Louisiana passed Act 620, which required “that every physician who performs or induces an abortion shall ‘have active admitting privileges at a hospital that is located not further than thirty miles from the location at which the abortion is performed or induced.’” To many observers, such a requirement obviously would help protect women who experience adverse events from an abortion.

Abortion business advocates, however, viewed the Louisiana law as a threat to its own economic survival specifically and to the prevalence of abortion in general. The abortion industry has been long accustomed to political preference that has helped them skirt the standard health and safety oversight measures applied to similar facilities.

Dr. Kermit Gosnell operated this deadly house of horrors
for years without proper health and safety oversight, due to
pro-abortion political influence.

In Pennsylvania, for example, a grand jury report documented how political determinations had exempted the abortion industry from health and safety inspections. That political favoritism and lack of health and safety oversight allowed the infamous Dr. Kermit Gosnell of Philadelphia to criminally operate a filthy and deadly abortion clinic that became known as a "House of Horrors."

As the Washington Post reported, "The grand jury report is full of horrific and gruesome details about the clinic that Gosnell ran for more than three decades. Patients were neglected; providers were not certified; and cats were allowed to roam and defecate in the clinic.

"'Gosnell had a simple solution for the unwanted babies he delivered: he killed them,' the report said. "He didn’t call it that. He called it 'ensuring fetal demise.' The way he ensured fetal demise was by sticking scissors into the back of the baby’s neck and cutting the spinal cord.'

"How did this happen? This is one of the questions that the grand jury seems to have grappled with: How did Gosnell run a non-compliant clinic for three decades? Much can be attributed to an egregious lapse in regulatory oversight, the report said."

Ultimately, the grisly Gosnell was "found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the death of patient Karnamaya Mongar who died at his late-term abortion clinic, and three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of four babies allegedly born alive inside the Women's Medical Society abortion clinic in West Philadelphia, Pa., that he operated for 40 years."

Obviously, for Gosnell's patients and the babies whom he dismembered, abortion was hardly "safer than childbirth."

Decades before the revelation of the Gosnell horrors, that oft-repeated myth served as a flimsy foundation for the Supreme Court's infamous Roe v. Wade decision. The Court's decision in Roe asserted that the relative safety of (early) abortion over childbirth is “now-established medical fact.”

One the contrary, the American Academy of Medical Ethics' brief notes, "The claim that abortion is safer than childbirth is a myth, resting on demonstrably flawed premises and refuted by study after study. The common claim of abortion advocates that abortion is safer than childbirth is based upon incomplete data and flagrantly inapt comparisons. The published medical evidence strongly suggests that abortion is more dangerous, not less, than childbirth."

Read more of the evidence and arguments from this important brief at www.cmda.org/abortionbrief.